Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 3554 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 72  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sat Sep 27, 2014 17:46 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Turn 5 win against a Druid in Ranked, which is about as quick as it gets..... This tipped me over into Rank 11.

Really brutal deck, I'd hate to face it myself in all honesty.

Attachment:
turn5.JPG


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 13:10 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
I was gonna try that deck, but it has too many cards I haven't got (in terms of not able to craft, since I haven't paid for Naxx).

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 13:18 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Curiosity wrote:
I was gonna try that deck, but it has too many cards I haven't got (in terms of not able to craft, since I haven't paid for Naxx).


Egads! Which wings are you missing?

There are some very solid cards in there. Loatheb for example is a lovely fit for nearly any deck, he's a solid body anyway, and the Battlecry is excellent against casters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 14:15 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
I finally have internet again on the home PC, but have a zillion other things to do. Will try to knock off at least 3 backlogged quests today for a fresher start tomorrow.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 14:30 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14489
Hearthly wrote:
There are some very solid cards in there. Loatheb for example is a lovely fit for nearly any deck, he's a solid body anyway, and the Battlecry is excellent against casters.


The spinners are also great for hunters - they are beasts so work with all the other beasty stuff and then give you random extras (i had in the past pulled a king Krush from one before I had my own)

My current hunter deck - i'm at level 14 and did get all the stars filled but did not win the next one to get to 13

Attachment:
Screen Shot 2014-09-28 at 14.29.09.png

Attachment:
Screen Shot 2014-09-28 at 14.29.25.png


I still have UTH on mine as it works well with a hyena to buff them up and with the knife juggler for random extra hits - but i could swap them plus the wolfs for something else

I do also like the mis-direction trap there are a few times when the other player buffs up one character to do a killing blow on me and then i re-direct them elsewhere (its great fun if the re-direct is actually to a killing blow on them)


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 15:15 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Hearthly wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
I was gonna try that deck, but it has too many cards I haven't got (in terms of not able to craft, since I haven't paid for Naxx).


Egads! Which wings are you missing?

There are some very solid cards in there. Loatheb for example is a lovely fit for nearly any deck, he's a solid body anyway, and the Battlecry is excellent against casters.


I have the first two wings; missing the last three.

Means I can't have the Mad Scientists or Undertakers.

I have decided to stop playing Arena for a bit and instead going to play Ranked and complete quests until I have 700 for the next wing, and then repeat.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 18:44 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Back by absolutely no demand whatsoever. Popular or otherwise.



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 14:51 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14489
Chinese 'real life' hearthstone game

http://www.gamesinasia.com/chinas-made- ... ard-hasnt/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 21:32 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Hmmmm.

If I silence a minion that has received a Blessing of Kings, I think it should remove the +4/+4 regardless of starting health. I can just about accept, albeit grudgingly, and IMO wrongly) that they can't reduce a minion to 0 and kill it via silence, but you should be able to reduce it back to what it was at.

Case in point:

Kodo injured down to 1 health. BoK boosts it back to 5 health, silence it and it stays on 5 health (I had assumed the Earth Shock would remove the boost and then kill it).

That's a crappy mechanic IMO.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 22:30 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Similarly with anything buffed by Stormwind Champion - if a buffed minion gets hit to 1 health, and then the champ dies, it stays at 1 health alive.

The better way to think of it is that the buff temporarily raises the max health higher while applying a heal and retains a minimum health of 1 when buffs are removed.

It's the only real way to do it, otherwise you'd be silencing things to death and silence isn't supposed to work like that.

I've seen people complain at the interaction between Crazed Alchemist and passive buffs and that one still confuses me.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 22:43 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
ElephantBanjoGnome wrote:
Similarly with anything buffed by Stormwind Champion - if a buffed minion gets hit to 1 health, and then the champ dies, it stays at 1 health alive.

The better way to think of it is that the buff temporarily raises the max health higher while applying a heal and retains a minimum health of 1 when buffs are removed.

It's the only real way to do it, otherwise you'd be silencing things to death and silence isn't supposed to work like that.

I've seen people complain at the interaction between Crazed Alchemist and passive buffs and that one still confuses me.


It is all logical although quite confusing until you've mapped it all out in your head. Certainly I learned the hard way not to silence Injured Blademasters.....

http://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearths ... hstone-101

Mind you though no one should listen to EBG about anything because he's a horrible wanker and I hate him. This has nothing to do with the latest whomping he delivered to me in one of our occasional jousts this evening, and is an entirely objective stance.

Quote:
Silence – Remove all text and non-aura buffs from the target. This removes all effects/abilities indicated by the text. Silencing a silenced minion has no effect (it does not remove the silence from the silenced minion). The interaction of silence and buffs can be complex. Below is a post from Blizzard on the topic with examples:

Health in Hearthstone works much like it works in World of Warcraft. Imagine a Priest running through Warsong Gulch with 1 Health remaining, only protected by the power of his Power Word: Fortitude. If a Shaman purges away the PW: Fortitude, the Priest’s maximum Health decreases, but his current Health isn’t affected. He lives to carry the flag another day. This is also true in Hearthstone. Silence removes buffs but doesn’t affect current Health, unless the new max Health is lower than the current Health.
Silence effects are technically not heals but can remove instances of damage. Let’s look at some in-game examples:
A 3/3 minion is buffed by Blessing of Kings (making it a 7/7). 5 damage is dealt to the minion. The minion goes from a 7/7 to 7/2. Silence is cast on it. The minion becomes a 3/2. Four of the instances of damage were removed along with the Blessing of Kings, and 1 instance of damage carried over to the minion. If the silence was cast first, the minion would have become 3/3, and then died to the 5 damage done to it.
A 3/3 minion is buffed by Blessing of Kings, making it a 7/7. 1 damage is dealt to the minion, making it a 7/6. Silence is then cast on it. The minion goes from a 7/6 to a 3/3 with no damage on it. The one instance of damage was removed along with the Blessing of Kings.
This 3/3 minion we are picking on is buffed by a +1/+1 non-Aura effect (like Shattered Sun Cleric), turning it into a 4/4. 2 damage is dealt to the minion, becoming a 4/2. Silence is then cast on it. The minion becomes a 3/2 with 1 damage on it. One instance of damage was removed along with the +1/+1 buff, and one remains on the minion.
Aura effects do not remove instances of damage when they are removed, because Aura effects will still persist through Silence unless the origin of the Aura buff is Silenced.
The enemy Stormwind Champion is buffing his Murloc Raider, making the Raider a 3/2. Silence the Murloc Raider (ahh why would ever do that??). The Murloc Raider is still a 3/2 – the Aura is coming from the Champion, and Silencing the Raider won’t accomplish much. After the terrible misplay, the player does 1 damage to the Murloc Raider, bringing him to a 3/1. Then, the Stormwind Champion dies, eliminating the +1/+1 buff on the Murloc. That instance of damage is not removed with the Aura and remains on the Murloc, who goes back to being a 2/1 (with one damage on him) and dies.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 22:55 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
ElephantBanjoGnome wrote:
Similarly with anything buffed by Stormwind Champion - if a buffed minion gets hit to 1 health, and then the champ dies, it stays at 1 health alive.

The better way to think of it is that the buff temporarily raises the max health higher while applying a heal and retains a minimum health of 1 when buffs are removed.

It's the only real way to do it, otherwise you'd be silencing things to death and silence isn't supposed to work like that.

I've seen people complain at the interaction between Crazed Alchemist and passive buffs and that one still confuses me.


Your first line - I have seen the same thing happen multiple times, but Blizzard in that post say killing the champion will kill the minion that was buffed. Even Blizzard don't understand their silly system!

I agree that you shouldn't be able to silence people to death (well, I'd rather you could, but that's a different kettle of fish; I understand why you can't), but I think the buffs shouldn't also be heals, and that wounds should persevere. I understand that Blizzard have not implemented it that way, but that's due to it being a hangover from WoW. I think had Hearthstone been created without any reference to the existing game of a different genre, they would have implemented the buffs differently.

In my example, I think an Earth Shock (Silence, then 1 damage) should kill an injured minion that was buffed from 1 health by something like BoK). The blessing is what is giving him 4 extra health points. Remove the blessing, remove the health.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:06 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Hearthly wrote:
Mind you though no one should listen to EBG about anything because he's a horrible wanker and I hate him.

That's ok, many agree with you ;)

Honestly though, it's quite unlucky that you haven't beaten me lately. That RNG yo.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 22:02 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Ah, it's always rather nice when you beat a player in arena with legendary card backs :)

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 20:50 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
5/0 in Arena with a really solid Paladin deck.

Then went 5/3, up against absolute bullshit where in two losses the opponent comes back from 1-2 health with top decks to win, with the exact cards needed to *just* prevent lethal. Fuck you, fucking game, you cheating twat.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 20:52 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
ElephantBanjoGnome wrote:
5/0 in Arena with a really solid Paladin deck.

Then went 5/3, up against absolute bullshit where in two loses the opponent comes back from 1-2 health with top decks to win, with the exact cards needed to *just* prevent lethal. Fuck you, fucking game, you cheating twat.


Arena in 'REALLY FUCKING ANNOYING' shocker.

It's a bullshit game mode, just ditch it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 21:19 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
It obviously didn't like the fact I was winning, and decided to alter the curve from 'challenging' to 'fucking bullshit'.

I had a fellow paladin down to 2, with plenty on the board to kill him. He then drops a fucking Tyrion. Why do I never draft a fucking Tyrion?

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 21:40 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
ElephantBanjoGnome wrote:
It obviously didn't like the fact I was winning, and decided to alter the curve from 'challenging' to 'fucking bullshit'.

I had a fellow paladin down to 2, with plenty on the board to kill him. He then drops a fucking Tyrion. Why do I never draft a fucking Tyrion?


This is why I refuse to play Arena, I can understand the arguments as to why it's adaptive and how it makes the mode kinder and more accessible for a broader range of players, but if I've got a shit deck and/or I'm playing shit I'd rather the run just bust me out instead of taking pity on me with a couple of compensation wins against a blind quadriplegic in Bulgaria.

Similarly speaking if I've brought my A game to the table and/or I've just happened to draft a fucking kick-ass deck, I'd like to see that out to a fair and random conclusion too, instead of suddenly finding myself pitched against fucking Hearthstone Jesus and his God-Summoned Deck Of Plenty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 21:55 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Yes, more Arena here. Just lost a game to a mage with ARCHMAGE FUCKING ANTONIDAS.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 23:03 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
I've had arena matches against people with 4-5 legendaries. Sometimes it happens. I had a deck with three once, but two were the worst ones that you would draft below a passable regular card and the other only got drawn once.

It happens.

I still like it, for all its flaws, not least because I get to use cards that are behind the paywall.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 23:43 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Somehow I played four arenas today.

1/3, 3/3, 5/3, 5/3

Meh.

Total winnings were 4 packs, 210 gold, 30 dust, a Golden Common, and a Rare (as individual card rewards).

Meh.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 23:53 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Curiosity wrote:
I still like it, for all its flaws, not least because I get to use cards that are behind the paywall.


THERE IS NO PAYWALL.

100% of the game is available to 100% of players, from the stingiest bastards on the planet (hello EBG!) to millionaires, not one single solitary aspect of the game is locked off to anyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 8:23 
User avatar
Level 6 Laser Lotus

Joined: 26th Aug, 2010
Posts: 2069
Did I like the pack I just opened.....

Image

yes, yes I did :D

Bloodmage is one of the cards I have been after but isn't at the top of the list, will keep him for now but nice to know he can always be dusted for any other legendary.

_________________
Shin: a device for finding furniture in the dark

If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 9:24 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Congrats!

He's one of those cards that's good enough to hang onto IMO, and it's amazing how useful that +1 spell damage can be in certain situations. (In my pally deck for example, boosting a Consecration up to 3 damage or a Hammer of Wrath to 4 can be surprisingly more effective than the standard versions.) Plus of course he replaces himself upon death, or he may even tease out a silence from your opponent which is arguably overkill on their part.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 15:10 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
2/3 Arena. Really good Warlock deck, that immediately hit utter fucking insanity and I couldn't get a foothold in anything. Total bullshit.

Avg. cost per pack is now > 70g. If it gets too high I'll abandon Arena as insufficient value ;)

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 15:50 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Hearthly wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
I still like it, for all its flaws, not least because I get to use cards that are behind the paywall.


THERE IS NO PAYWALL.

100% of the game is available to 100% of players, from the stingiest bastards on the planet (hello EBG!) to millionaires, not one single solitary aspect of the game is locked off to anyone.


:DD I only said that to troll you :DD

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 15:57 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22266
My arena stats:

Attachment:
Screen Shot 2014-10-04 at 15.52.40.jpg


Numbers are slightly out as it doesn't count my games on the ipad, so if I do a few games on that in a middle of a run it thinks my end result is lower than it actually is. i.e my highest result is actually 8/3, but it was recorded as a 7/3 as I won one of the games on the ipad...

With a 3.2 win rate, it still makes sense to play arena rather than buy cards, and I really enjoy the mode so double win :)


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 16:52 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Curiosity wrote:
:DD I only said that to troll you :DD


Gah! Your trolling was successful, bastard-face. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 20:33 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Trooper wrote:
My arena stats:

It reckons my win rate is about 60%, although I know the bot has missed a lot as I've either had it off, or didn't update it when they put the Naxx boards into rotation (which made the bot think you were playing the campaign mode).

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 12:33 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
That 'resurrect your dead minions' legendary is a bit of a fucker, isn't he?

Unless you have a Hex/Polymorph/Assassinate then if he gets behind a couple of taunts you're boned.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 12:40 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Ugh. Everyone has every legendary at the moment. If a game gets to the 10th round and I've not seen at least 3 it is rare.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 14:15 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Yes I was thinking that. I've suffered a few losses because I couldn't deal with fucking Ragnaros, Ysera, Gromash, and Sylvannas in a single game.

I wouldn't mind so much but I haven't unpacked a legendary in forever.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 14:26 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22266
Thats why I play arena these days, it's both more random and more fair at the same time :) Makes for a much more interesting game rather than dealing with the same old decks stuffed full of legendaries.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 14:40 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Oh come on I think it's a bit rich to be moaning about legendary heavy decks when we've all been playing the game for months, unless Curio is trolling me again :hat:

Even if you're not prepared to spend any money it's pretty easy to put together 500 gold per week which is 20 packs per month which on average is one legendary per month, and if you get a crap one you can always dust it for a quarter of the cost of one you want. (Plus all dupes and/or Arena rewards add dust too.)

On top of that I don't think the meta is that legendary heavy at the moment either, (certainly between Ranks 20-10 which is where I tend to sit), a lot of the old-school legendaries such as Ysera are just too damn slow for the meta. (I crafted myself a Black Knight the other week for my hunter deck, but I'm still sat on nearly 2000 dust with not much idea what to craft with it, but I certainly wouldn't want a fucking Ysera.)

Sylvannas I find to be of the easier legendaries to play around. I don't like seeing her pop up, but Shammies comboing her with reincarnate is the scariest thing about her IMO.

Also, it seems to me that a lot of the legendaries being played are out of Naxx, which are available to everyone for free (as EBG demonstrated).

Now that's not to say that there aren't decks out there absolutely stuffed to the gills with legendaries, of course there are, but I don't think they're (a) Prevalent or (b) Game-breaking in any way.

Any deck running with a clutch of big legendaries is inevitably sacrificing early game, exploit that with a quick deck and run the fuckers down! You need a quick deck for the current meta anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 14:49 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22266
I'm currently 5-0 in constructed with a Paladin Divine Shield based deck. Not sure how it will fair at the upper ranks, but seems solid at the moment, and isn't a favoured meta deck so people don't expect it. I got my blood knight to 15/15 a couple of games ago as no-one clears out the shields :)
I should really craft another blood knight (I only have one) and the Paladin legendary if I want it to be competitive at higher ranks I expect.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 14:55 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Trooper wrote:
I'm currently 5-0 in constructed with a Paladin Divine Shield based deck. Not sure how it will fair at the upper ranks, but seems solid at the moment, and isn't a favoured meta deck so people don't expect it. I got my blood knight to 15/15 a couple of games ago as no-one clears out the shields :)
I should really craft another blood knight (I only have one) and the Paladin legendary if I want it to be competitive at higher ranks I expect.


Ooohhh let's have a look at the deck :) I like playing pally.

The pally legendary is mega-awesome but he's very vulnerable to a hex/poly, and a silence leaves him looking a bit daft too. It's also particularly annoying when he gets killed and then the Ashbringer gets Oozed.

I always run him in whatever pally deck I'm mucking about with though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 15:09 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
It's not as simple as playing around one legendary. It's when they're thunking down one after another, and all of the ones I've listed aren't Naxx ones. And yes, this applies even at the high ranks, but that might be because it's still early in the month and the lower rank players are grinding back up, so the perception of rank 20-10 is skewed because the people playing clearly aren't middlingly crap as they should be.

In other news, my 'good in theory bad in practice' Warlock deck couldn't get two wins for the quest after maybe 6 attempts, so I junked it for a generic zoo and now I'm something like 4/0. Fucking zoo.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 16:56 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22266
Hearthly wrote:
Trooper wrote:
I'm currently 5-0 in constructed with a Paladin Divine Shield based deck. Not sure how it will fair at the upper ranks, but seems solid at the moment, and isn't a favoured meta deck so people don't expect it. I got my blood knight to 15/15 a couple of games ago as no-one clears out the shields :)
I should really craft another blood knight (I only have one) and the Paladin legendary if I want it to be competitive at higher ranks I expect.


Ooohhh let's have a look at the deck :) I like playing pally.


Attachment:
Screen Shot 2014-10-05 at 16.55.42.jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 17:19 
User avatar
Hello Hello Hello

Joined: 11th May, 2008
Posts: 13382
Cheers :) Might have a tickle with myself!

I think I've already got two Blood Knights and if I haven't it's no problem to craft another.

Do you find you're needing the heals from the GoKs? I'd be inclined to swap them out for Raggie and Tirion.

Then again with the Argent Commanders, aren't they hard to get any synergy with the Blood Knights? What with them having charge and so little health, they need their shield not to just die against whatever they're charged into.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 17:27 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22266
The GoKs and Argent's are mainly used with BoK and Blessed Champion as finishers. But you're right, those two and the BoKs are candidates for swapping out for other big minions.

The Blood knights use the argent squires, HoP, Scarlets and Argent Protectors to get buffed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 17:52 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Just played against a priest. He had 5 minions on the table, including the one that makes your healing spells do damage instead. Then he played soulfire and accidentally wiped out all his own minions :)

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2014 20:46 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
TBF, Hearthly, even buying a pack every two days (which means no days off playing, no Naxx, no Arena), it would likely take over 2 months to earn enough dust to craft a legendary... and that's based on my average dust haul now, after collecting most of the regular cards on offer, and crafting no other cards at all.

You can do everythig for free, but only if you play every hour of the day, and even then getting Naxx + legendary cards + playing Arena would probably be v hard.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 10:40 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Can confirm. I've been dusting an average of 4 cards per opened pack for ages, and I've strategically disenchanted the common cards I'm unlikely to use but will probably reopen in a future pack just to get my short term dust up.

Despite this I'm still lingering at around ~1200 dust and that represents a lot of saving. Even if you're lucky enough to unpack a legendary you already have, that's still only 400 dust. That would need to happen four times (and it's a rare event in itself) to actually get hold of one missing legendary.

The dream of 2 copies of everything either requires an absurd amount of play (high result Arenas to maximum value), or the investment of much cash for many, many packs. It's a long old road.

At last count I still required 66 unique cards to get one of everything, and quite a few of those are legendaries. Many of the others are epics. All expensive in terms of dust and rare in terms of pack opening.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 10:50 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22266
This is me :

Attachment:
Screen Shot 2014-10-06 at 10.46.32.png


I'm sitting on about 3300 dust at the moment, I should probably craft a couple of legendaries, but not sure what.

I've been playing since the end of beta, and have bought 55 packs with cash. The rest have been through gold and arena.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:25 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
If we're comparing the card-peen size:

Cards with not at least 1
Neutral 36
Druid 2
Hunter 5
Mage 5
Paladin 2
Priest 0
Rogue 3
Shaman 4
Warlock 6
Warrior 3

Total Missing 66

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:30 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22266
ElephantBanjoGnome wrote:
If we're comparing the card-peen size:

Cards with not at least 1
Neutral 36
Druid 2
Hunter 5
Mage 5
Paladin 2
Priest 0
Rogue 3
Shaman 4
Warlock 6
Warrior 3

Total Missing 66


Ah, my 90 is to get two of everything. I shall do some excel magic to get the number for one of everything.

I think i've been pretty lucky in my pack opening compared to most, to be honest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:44 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22266
tada!

Attachment:
Screen Shot 2014-10-06 at 11.43.11.png


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 11:47 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Oh in that case I hate you then, only 39 cards!

Although having said that apparently I 'only' need 45000 dust, so that shows that a lot of the missing ones we share are the dust-heavy cards, and the 30-odd missing commons/rares don't cost very much at all.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 18:56 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Heh. Just fought as a Mage against a Druid.

He had me on toast. Down to 10 health (he's on 16) with a Gruul and a 0/2 taunt (and no cards). He had two 5/5 and a load of cards.

He decides to play around with me and silences Gruul instead of the taunt (giving him the win) and brings out a load more minions.

I top deck a Pyroblast and kill him.

Silly showoff :D

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hearthstone thread
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 23:57 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Man, 7/0 in Ranked with this bloody Zoo deck. It's far too easy, not one of the games has been close. I just rattled through the 5-win quest in 23 minutes. Less than 5 mins per game!

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 3554 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 72  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.