Dudley wrote:
Mr Chris wrote:
Frankly, some of the rabid anti-religiosity around these days is as bad as the fundies. You can't lump all christians in as being evil, gay-hating, anti-abortionist, condom-denying arseholes just because some are. It'd be like saying all atheists are irritating, nasal, effeminate fuckwits just because Dawkins is.
Yes you can, because if they're good Christians they believe in everything the bible says.
Except this is not true, as any biblical scholar (or Dave) can tell you. The Bible is made up of so many different letters, books, stories, manuscripts, and there are many more which are sort of part of it but not. It's not a coherent whole (which is how you're viewing it), but as well as the direct stuff about Jesus, or the stories about what God said to Moses (and then changed his mind about), it contains lots of second hand theorising and metaphorical stories. As with anything, you take the core tenets (God existing, and the ten commandments) and make what you can of the rest of the evidence. Christ, if even
God changes his mind in there, then the average Christian is going to have to do some interpretation as to what comes out the end of the book as the resultant message.
Which neatly invalidates ever using a bible passage to back up a religious message surely?